Vital Statistics:
Last
|
Change
|
Percent
|
|
S&P Futures
|
1790.1
|
-1.7
|
-0.09%
|
Eurostoxx Index
|
2989.6
|
-2.2
|
-0.07%
|
Oil (WTI)
|
97.44
|
0.2
|
0.25%
|
LIBOR
|
0.242
|
0.000
|
-0.10%
|
US Dollar Index (DXY)
|
80.76
|
0.140
|
0.17%
|
10 Year Govt Bond Yield
|
2.86%
|
0.03%
|
|
Current Coupon Ginnie Mae TBA
|
104.3
|
-0.1
|
|
Current Coupon Fannie Mae TBA
|
103.4
|
-0.1
|
|
RPX Composite Real Estate Index
|
200.7
|
-0.2
|
|
BankRate 30 Year Fixed Rate Mortgage
|
4.52
|
Markets are
slightly lower after a stronger-than-expected GDP report and some other good
labor-market data. Bonds and MBS are selling off, and the market is setting
itself up for a strong jobs report tomorrow.
The second
revision to third quarter GDP came
in at 3.6%, much higher than the 3.1% estimate. Consumption was a little lower
than expected at 1.4%, and the inflation was at 2%. Inventory build drove the
increase, and consumer spending was somewhat low, so unless spending picks up,
Q3 will end up "borrowing" growth from Q4. The main takeaway from the
report? Higher interest rates aren't acting like a drag on the economy, at
least not yet, which has to be a relief to the Fed.
Initial Jobless
Claims printed below 300k, although that number should be taken with a grain of
salt due to the Thanksgiving holiday. Challenger and Gray reported announced
job cuts dropped 20% as well. The Challenger Survey looks at company press releases
of restructurings and job cuts. Many of these cuts never end up materializing,
but they do weigh heavily on consumer confidence.
The Street
expectation for payroll growth is 185k, and a print like 220k would be
considered a "blowout" number. However, historically, is that a
"good" number? Actually it is. Since 1980, monthly payroll growth has
averaged around 100k. During the boom years of the 95-99, payrolls averaged
224k a month. So something like 220k would be considered a "normal"
expansionary number, with all the caveats about population growth, etc.. Keep
this in mind when a borrower asks “should I lock or roll the dice that I can
get better rates later on?” You would have to go back to the 1960s to get 4.5%
rates in the context of normal payroll growth.
In an effort to
change the subject from the growing pains of obamacare, the President gave
a speech about income
inequality and the need to hike the minimum wage. Politically, this is going
absolutely nowhere, and all he is really doing is rallying his base.
Separately, fast
food workers in 100 cities today
are going on strike to protest low wages. It will be interesting to see if they
get any traction. The reason why inflation has been so low has been the lack of
wage growth - you cannot get a wage / price spiral if the "wage" side
doesn't cooperate. The Fed wants to see a modest amount of inflation - for the
average American, 3% inflation and 3% wage growth is a lot more comfortable
than 0% inflation and 0% wage growth. Plus, the biggest problem for Americans
is debt, and inflation is a debtor's best friend.
Brent Nyitray, CFA
Director of Capital Markets
iDirect Home Loans
National Asset Direct
Dellacamera Capital Management
1010 Washington Blvd, 6th Floor
Stamford, CT 06901
203-817-3614 (w)
917-841-4938 (c)
No comments:
Post a Comment